Questions (What are Northern Inuits like as pets) Questions

May I ask why you have this, surely this should have been given back to TDIA when you left? :?

you know that Cheyennes dog is a Northern Inuit, are you just trying to start another argument

I wouldnt have thought so, just to emphasize the point that It Is a British Inuit not a Northern Inuit, you cant have one breed and register it as another, future puppy owners are entitled to know exactly what they are getting, dont you agree?

What a ridiculous thing to say. It was at one time on the TIDA website. Anybody could have taken a copy of it.

All I was pointing out was that it does state that he is a British Inuit as you obviously know. This was not meant to start an argument at all just pointing out a fact.

Absolutely right, so what dogs exactly were used to make up the NI? I believe all that info was/is in the head of the founder breeders. It's about time the true origins of the breed were out in the open for the sake of future puppy owners, as you said.
Becky

Is this mud slinging really necessary? All it does is discredit your beautiful dogs and make future owners think twice about becoming involved, which would be a real shame

Minniehaha,
There are plenty of threads about NI.s Bi's Utes Tamaskan Dogs, Illamars etc on here as you well know,
As this thread is deviating away from the Original posters question, I really dont see any point in it
The NI has tried to answer questions on various threads but none have been pleasant. or Locked
I dont see any further point in this thread . I am not going to post on this thread anymore . As suggested the Original poster asks her questions on the NI Society ..where there is no backbiting and most can give a clearer picture of the Ni as most of us own them

Why can't they give the same clear answers on here then? Or is it that there are many of us who will question what is said whereas on the forums whatever is said will be taken as gospel?
Becky

My dog's Dam and Sire were registered with the NIS, just because he was registered with a dif group as a pup, because his breeder fell out with JK and left the NIS, doesn't make him a dif breed from his parents. His Dam was bred by JK and his Sire came from dogs bred by JK, you know this.

So he is a NI.. even i understand that 1.

Yes he is just like his parents

Actually no I did not know this. I have no reason to have memorised your dogs pedigree.

So if you don't know all the facts, maybe it is wiser to stick to the details you do know as fact.
It would be like me saying julies "h" isn't a pedigree leo, although i don't know all the dogs in his pedigree, why should i think of him as anything but a leo, i know he is cause he has some of the same relatives as mine.
There is alot of negative comment around the NI as a breed from all sides involved, without rumors relating to any 1 persons dogs going round.
I still can't understand why as NI Owners you can't stop the bickering and put your dogs 1st, if you care about the breed as much as you seem to, do some thing postive for them.

But if you have his BVA certificate, you can see who his parents are, his ped is on my website for everyone to see, and surely before you make comments weather a dog is this or that you should've looked at the dogs ped first.

I m lost, why would abbie have your dogs BVA paperwork?

Yes and it states he is a british inuit which is what I pointed out.

Leo I do not have his paperwork I have a copy of it. I was emailed this to put up onto the TIDA website at the time. This was there for a while on the website for anybody to see or take a copy off. Hope that answers your question.

Yep it does.... cheers.

you seem to have memorised the hip score certificate though