Love it, the Boxer belongs to a friend of a friend of mine, he is adorable, Just to point out, ALL of the animals (including the Boxer) on the trampoline are computerized, it was in one of the papers, the first glimpse of the foxes are real, but them everything else is animation.
If it works - I am the world's worst link poster - this is funny. Here's hoping, if it doesn't work, I apologise now!
For some unknown reason I could not respond to Azz's OP about the John Lewis ad on the Boxer section, and I cannot respond to yours on that thread either. But it dinnarf make me larf an' I nearly adda naccident in my nikkies!
John Lewis Christmas ad is a massive hit with Buster the boxer… and you won’t believe how he celebrates seeing it
Sorry Azz don't get it specially the last ont ..... the John Lewis add (and others) has a feel good factor, nothing wrong with that. We are allowed to to feel a little good will at Xmas if we want without politically motivated statements trying to dampen the mood or invent things that are not there all because of a to add What the headlines on newspapers have to do with a tv add of a dog bouncing on a trampoline has to do with anything I have no idea. We have enough crap posted every day about intolerance , hatred , racisam to last a lifetime, leave Xmas alone and let us have a little joy with being made to feel we are feeding all the above.
Boxers are great! they can be the perfect pet too! from what I hear, Boxers are now the number one breed in america funny video up there! thanks for posting it.
Many people (including many partners who co-own John Lewis) are upset that John Lewis and others are quite happy to tout 'goodwill to all' but they have rejected calls to stop advertising with hate groups such as the Daily Mail, Daily Express and The Sun. Objecting to 'newspapers' calling children who are risking their lives to escape persecution 'swarms' is not crap. It's disgusting the way migrants have been referred to in these rags and how they incite and stoke hatred. I'm glad there are people now coming together to boycott brands that fund these hate groups. If you want to blame anyone blame these brands for lacking in morals and ethics and for not genuinely giving a damn about 'goodwill to all'.
I'm sorry Azz, but if all of the commercial enterprises stopped advertising they wouldn't be commercial enterprises for long. For goodness sake, raise objections to the newspapers by all means, but, come on, John Lewis advertising or not will make no difference whatsoever to irresponsible reporting
It makes a huge difference. The more brands that pull their advertising the less profits the papers make - then they can either go bust, or take a more ethical standpoint. The brands that are perfect to approach are precisely those who say they are ethical (like John Lewis) because this puts them to the test and asks whether they really mean it. Well done Lego and all the ethical brands that have come out in support of the #stopfundinghate campaign and severed ties with the vile rags like the Daily Mail. More pressure from John Lewis partners: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/john-lewis-under-pressure-partners-back-stop-funding-hate-campaign-1593586