I guess as she is no longer interested in breeding NIDs, she has two more NIDs up for sale, neither of those are spayed either, albeit one is 5 or 6 months old. Ref the others, I do not know.
That's such a shame Werewolf I'm of the school that you don't just get rid of your dogs because they're of no use to you any longer, and that goes for anyone.
That's because I've been given no reason too. As far as I'm aware, Julie still has her dogs. Or do you 'know' something I don't? As for anyone moving their dogs around as commodities, where have I said that anyone does?
So all the dogs that JK bred and kept as pups she still has? Dont live very long do they considering the oldest is about 7!!!! Do you agree with Laura (Luz) selling/rehoming Brodie, advertising she was possessive and not suitable to live with children or other dogs, yet she saw fit to breed two litters from the dog with this temperament?
No, I'm not saying that Dawn so please don't twist my words. I'm saying that Julie still has her dogs, nothing to do with the pups her dogs have had.
I havent twisted them Corrie, its a perfectly true statement and question! You said JK still has her dogs, did you just mean she has the ones she keeps having rehomed/sold the ones she no longer has use for then? p.s. I added to my last post to save posting another.
Sorry, you've added to your post. Brodie became possessive and aggressive towards other dogs AFTER she had her pups. Up until then, she was a placid dog (and yes I met Brodie) If it was any different Dawn, Laura knows I would of said something too her.
Bloody hell woman, I'm quoting all over the place here The only dogs I know that Julie has got is her own dogs. I don't know of any others that have been re-homed. the one's that are sold are pups that she's had from a mating instead of payment (stud fee/pick of litter) or pups that she's had through breeding terms.
What, she became aggressive after having a litter of pups, so she had another litter from her? I think rehoming an aggressive dog is extremely irresponsible dont you, especially when you are fully aware of it. Doing well arent we
Ahh I get it, take a pup instead of a stud fee, then sell the pup for at least double what the stud fee would be, got you! MONEY!!!!!!!
in my 20yrs experience no LS. I think in this case we are either expected to believe the bitch had a litter and was fine, in which case throws out the aggression after a litter theory, or the breeder wasnt concerned with the aggression and bred the bitch again anyway and afterwards didnt fit in, so was sold on.
Up untill not so lond ago JK had a bitch called Hex, she re-homed that dog... Y? cos it was exposed that Hex may and prob is a carrier of epilepsy, and therefore was no longer a use to JK cos she could not breed her cos everyone knew she was a carrier so is it ok for jk but not for sc although there are ather reason envolved as to why sc is selling, I can only surgest that you ask SC herself rather then go on heresay and jump to your own conclusions! P.s sorry for the bad spelling, not my good point lol
Dawn, I do not know the ins and outs of Laura/Brodie but I do know that Laura is a lovely, genuine woman and would never do anything of intentional detrement to any animal. Ref rehoming an agressive dog, well the only one I know of to have done that was a person with a GSD that attacked her, this resulted in a bad bite to the owners arm, so much so she spoke of having the GSD put to sleep. However, instead the dog got rehomed to someone with a pub and family.
You have got to be joking? What person would pay a £700 stud fee for an NI, are you honestly serious? even if you are same goes, buy a pup, sell it on........!!