Greyhound homing scandal Discussions

Ellis · Jun 3, 2010

A greyhound not earning its keep has to go and many of the dogs are being off-loaded by their trainer without any concern given for the animal’s future welfare. Please view:

Likely many people shopping recently in the sleepy Suffolk town of Leiston will have spotted an advertisement in the towns pet shop window for “12 greyhounds free to good home(s).” The ad raised various comments including “what will happen to those not taken” and “how come there are twelve available all at the same time!” Scratch the surface and revealed is widespread indiscriminate homing of greyhounds and a quandary the greyhound racing industry will likely never satisfactorily address.

Every year many thousands of greyhounds never make the grade to race or have their career on the track terminated due to injury, age or simply because the dog fell short of expectations. The majority are killed but in what might best be described as a public relations exercise the regulatory body has sought to increase homing figures that just 10 years ago were pitifully low.

The Retired Greyhound Trust (RGT), funded by the racing industry, officially homed 4,725 greyhounds in 2009, a figure that represents about one quarter of greyhounds bred to meet the demand generated by British greyhound tracks. Though a marked improvement on 1,893 in 2001 the annual homing figure has increased little since 2007.

Perhaps, without a massive boost in funding, the RGT is close to the maximum figure obtainable and feedback from members of the racing fraternity would indicate an ever increasing number of trainers are homing dogs independently, essentially for two reasons: the fee or ‘donation’ requested by rescues (to cover in part costs incurred including neutering) and the waiting list that commonly prevails.

The greyhounds advertised in the above pet shop were being off-loaded by trainer Chris Mosdall, a major player at Harlow stadium. When interest was expressed in homing two of the dogs Mosdall sounded delighted. No home check would be carried out and needless to say none of the greyhounds will be neutered prior to homing.

And whilst Mosdall was led to believe I had never previously adopted a greyhound, little advice was given. More worryingly, the trainer didn’t ask any questions about my situation concerning such matters to include work, home and garden. In theory I could be living on the top floor of a block of flats or banned from keeping animals.

Mosdall, however, had the uncanny ability to tell from my voice that the dogs would be well looked after and the opportunity to get rid of one, possibly two greyhounds, quickly at zero cost is of course incidental.

Further consider that a vet may charge in the region £35 to euthanize a track dog and the attraction of advertising a greyhound ‘free to good home’ is all too apparent. Even having the animal shot is not without cost and may result in disciplinary action. And with the survival of racing increasingly dependent on professional trainers and survival for the trainers increasingly dependent on running a large number of dogs such costs are now a key business consideration.

Margins are very tight even for successful players, a point Oxford champion trainer Michael Peterson touched on in conversation last year: “The finances in this sport are piss poor. A lot of trainers are basically just covering their costs which to be honest with you I am. I am not making bundles of money, I’ve got a young family and I have eight to nine dogs here that need homing.”

The result is frequently the independent and indiscriminate homing of greyhounds. Not surprisingly, many such dogs see a quick succession of ownership and many are later found neglected, abused and abandoned.

When of no further use or value as a racing dog, Rum Gal (trained under Margaret Bailey) was not placed with a rescue but rather homed independently and seemingly off-loaded without any concern given for the animal’s future welfare and security. Months later Rum Gal was picked up as a stray on the streets of Norwich.

Tasmanian Diego was given away just 2 days after her career on the track was terminated due to injury. No doubt the trainer, Ian Brown, was elated when the prospective owner, Angela Laver, agreed also to adopt Burgoyne Bunny who had retired through injury 4 days previously. Unable to cope, Laver off-loaded both greyhounds within a couple of weeks of signing the adoption forms. Burgoyne Bunny was later found abandoned in a flat and Tasmanian Diego spent just 3 months in her next ‘forever’ home.

And two young bitches, given away by Mosdall about five months prior to the ad in Leiston pet shop window, were picked up in the Wanstead area in appalling condition. Mosdall was to remark: “The people who do that to dogs should have it done to them, that’s the way I look at it.” My view is trainers should not be allowed to home dogs independently as there is a clear conflict of interest.

Furthermore, there is arguably a breach of Greyhound Board of Great Britain (GBGB) Rules of Racing. Rule 18 covers responsibility of the owner and subsection 1, e states that when a greyhound is sold or found a home this action is to be carried out “responsibly.”

Mosdall was reported to the GBGB but is unlikely to face disciplinary action. Investigation Officer Clive Carr has previously visited Norfolk to follow up a number of similar reported breaches in the above rule but appeared more interested in those making the allegations than the allegations made and did not believe there was a case for any trainer or owner to answer.

Perhaps, as a representative of the regulatory body, this should come as no surprise. Officials no doubt appreciate the difficulties facing trainers and it suits the industry to turn a blind eye. A greyhound indiscriminately homed is still a greyhound homed and collectively the national homing figure receives a significant boost without any funding from the industry. This data can in turn be used to promote greyhound racing. The trainer wins, the industry wins and who cares about the welfare of greyhounds.

A simple amendment to Rule 18 that would help eliminate the above scandal was put to the regulatory body back in 2007 but dismissed out of hand, and whilst very evident apathy prevails so the tragedy will continue.
Click to expand...

borderladysue · Jun 3, 2010

Sadly there are so many of these poor dogs advertised FREE around this area, and a lot of them quite young, i went to a local dog show the other week and the greyhound rescue were there with the dogs wearing tabards stating give me a home please, so heart breaking.:-(

mo · Jun 3, 2010

And again sadly its not just greyhounds this happens too, go look at some of the free ads, there are HUNDREDS of dogs just being given away willy nilly to anyone that will take them.

mO

spot · Jun 3, 2010

borderladysue said: ↑

Sadly there are so many of these poor dogs advertised FREE around this area, and a lot of them quite young, i went to a local dog show the other week and the greyhound rescue were there with the dogs wearing tabards stating give me a home please, so heart breaking.:-(
Click to expand...

Im afraid its totally indicative of those involved with and those who support this industry. Anyone supporting greyhound racing supports this side of the so call 'sport' as well. Not one trainer/owner that I have come into contact with has gven a damn where the dogs go to - whether it be to rescue, some bloke down the road with a bolt gun (even though thats perfectly acceptable to some on here) or just dumped muzzled to starve to death. The ones offered free to good home are the lucky ones believe me!

mo said: ↑

And again sadly its not just greyhounds this happens too, go look at some of the free ads, there are HUNDREDS of dogs just being given away willy nilly to anyone that will take them.

mO
Click to expand...

Of course its not just greyhound BUT greyhound are bought by owners KNOWING they will get rid of them into rescue (if they are lucky and not just taken a spade or bolt gun to) when they are past their usefullness - whether it be for profit or 'entertainment' value or just the kudos of owning a racing dog. They are nothing more than meat to these people and those that support or 'enjoy' the entertainment the 'stock' give.

CovetKaty · Sep 15, 2010

I have to say though, the RGT do wonderful work. We got Megan last year from RGT Sutton and they explained everything so well. We had a home check where they brought a greyhound of theirs round to show us how big they actually are and to be honest, if they hadn't asked US as many questions as we asked them I would have been suprised and probably not adopted from them. We donated £200 to them (100 more than meg's adoption fees) and regularly donate to them now.

It's horrible how many get dumped on them though, I know they're aware how many are wrongfully PTS because they've passed their 'use by date' so to speak but the waiting list for their kennels is obscene now. Speaking of which, the RGT in Portsmouth was totally overwhelemed when the stadium shut down!

I think it's so awful what happens to the more unlucky ones. But for the ones that do end up with RGT they get what they need after a life of entertaining the masses.

Greyhound homing scandal Discussions

Ellis New Member

Greyhound homing scandal

borderladysue New Member

mo New Member

spot New Member

CovetKaty New Member

Share This Page

Official threads